Mr. Davis,
A most "MODERATE?" response!
Your statement, "You know full well my continued comments are because of questions asked about the previous processes. Seeing I was involved from day one with the WWTP site and part of the "Mitchell Team" it seemed obvious who should respond to, at a minimum, a lack of knowledge by some of what transpired and at the worse complete false remarks about what transpired." is in clear contradiction of your other statements in the same post, "I have no interest in a DPW." and "I have no interest in being involved in a DPW." Again you leave questions to be directly answered!
For your statement, "You're continued phony contrarian statements rather than putting forth a solution to a major problem shows you for what you are. A problem creator and not a problem solver." One possible solution would be for you not to have any continuing interest in a DPW and not be involved in a DPW.
In relation to your: "So, rather than continue this obvious "baiting", why not put forth your "team", put together a viable solution, pro-bono, for the Town, get most of the BOS, half the Fincom, all the BPCC and a majority of Town Meeting to support you and then take the cheap shots that you now feel obligated to put forth when you don't get the 2/3rds required." This has been done via the "Process", except the "pro bono" element.
Now for your: "WWII????-As I said: You are sick." You must have read of or lost a family member or family friend in World War II and the events that lead up to it and the horrors that it spewed along with the propaganda that was used to create this horror. Your "MODERATION" in labeling people or groups of people may be a problem to many.
View Comment
Mr. Davis,
You must have forgotten about answering some of previously submitted questions that would inform the taxpaying residents about restoring the facts of the DPW WWTP site bidding process.
Some were:
What was the date the BOS put this project out to bid?
Who were the qualified bidders?
Who received and recorded the bids?
Why wasn't the bid approved?
(Submitted on February 27, 2013 - 12:42pm)
By the way, it appears that you keep hanging on to the DPW WWTP site no matter what issue comes up on "DV".
This propaganda routine you use, "repetition" no matter what the issue, was used most frequently previously and during WW II. History knows the rest. View Comment
MrWill:
(I ?) (We ?) Who?
You have confused the Seniors On Fixed Incomes and the Working Poor enough. It is about time you stop throwing yourself (yourselves) on the floor, kicking and screaming because you have the "right to"? View Comment
Mr. Davis,
Thanks for the opportunity for going on a "Buggy Ride Carousel" Mr. Music Man but no thanks.
That would be a lot of reading for no reason.
Everything already written is implied and nothing more. View Comment
Read the words:
"UPSO:
Mr. Davis has not as yet answered questions as to proving his claims of the BOS putting the $1.2M project at the WWTP out to bid implying that it was consistent with MGLs, advertising, etc.
Only claims!
It would be of good service to the Town if he could have the BOS(5) confirm his claims.
Submitted on February 28, 2013 - 10:48am." View Comment
MrWill,
"The day the Federal Government give's me that option I will, until then I prefer my Federal tax money being spent in this Nation, or my local Town. :)"
Tell that to your representatives not to "just a guy". View Comment
MrWill,
The Town doesn't need any kind of vehicle if it isn't going anywhere not even if it were a Ford Pinto. It is moving so slow an uncontrolled tricycle hitting it from behind would cause it to explode. View Comment
Juggy,
"MrWill:
Just A Guy,
Last time I saw Juggy, Juggy and a couple of the Ponderosa Boys were coming out of McDee's with some large Coffee's and some paperwork with 2010 dated on it. :)"
Again, "A house of mirrors..."
View Comment
"Mr Will"(Whatever this time.) claims that a "Democratic" process is a hard sell in Town.
Where in the previous related post did "UPSO" indicate any support for any particular project?
This fear about using the established Town "Democratic" process is evident.
Again: "Americans always do the right thing after they have tried everything else." - Winston Churchill View Comment
Wouldn't it be best to have this project proceed to the Town on its own need, merit, to establish its priority so that it can be given the democratic process as the Town has established in its Charter?
The DODO bird is said: "Flies backward because it dose not care where it is going, but wants to know where it has been."
Before an "Army" proceeds its "Engineers" prepare a way. Their path has been made clear for them and the others that follow in their support. Not keeping that path clear in support of an advance is a strategic flaw unless it is a "Retreat".
Advance or Retreat? Where does the Town want to go? Is there a "Future" for the Town? Is there any moving ahead spirit?
View Comment
Mr. Davis has not as yet answered questions as to proving his claims of the BOS putting the $1.2M project at the WWTP out to bid implying that it was consistent with MGLs, advertising, etc.
Only claims!
It would be of good service to the Town if he could have the BOS(5) confirm his claims. View Comment
Mr. Davis
You did not answer any questions from this previous "post" then, should it be trusted that you are unwilling to answer the questions submitted on February 27, 2013 - 12:42pm by this respondence? View Comment
union man,
Then go to the BOS and propose it, better yet have them put it on the Town Meeting agenda.
Start getting the signatures now. you may still have time. View Comment
union man,
Then go to the BOS and propose it, better yet have them put it on the Town Meeting agenda.
Start getting the signatures now. you may still have time. View Comment
Mr. Davis,
"Jack Davis:
Here are the facts, as requested:
1) The building portion of the project was put out to bid by the BOS and six bids came in at an average cost of one million dollars for a completed building with furnishings and equipment. The remainder of the 2.1 million was the washbay, salt shed, new entry, RR crossing and site work along with a contingency of 10%."
What was the date the BOS put this project out to bid?
Who were the qualified bidders?
Who received and recorded the bids?
Why wasn't the bid approved?
That is only part of the issues related to question #1.
Your answers appear to be more of a problem than they solve but to be sure you will be "Nimble and Quick..."
View Comment
frog pond:
Your question: "But does that really cost $8 million?"
The following is a quote:
"To meet the "Town" DPW needs review public records to see a complete line by line "Project Cost" prepared by a professional cost estimator including full supporting plan, elevation and section documentation.
This estimate indicates all the elements that go into a "Project Cost" including contingencies. Contingencies are those component costs of a project that can not be fully defined such as the "scope" of the sites probable soil contamination.
There are "Outline Specifications" for all the components of the proposed structure upon which the estimate was based.
There is an "Equipment" listing etc...
Every component of a full estimate is indicated to indicate the full probable "Project Cost"
So if you want to know if this is a $8M "Town" DPW project vs. a $2.1M "minimized scope" project cost , you should review the full recorded documentation available and make up your own mind.
Thank you for your attention!
View Comment
66°
